Skip to Main Content
ʙᴇʟʟᴀᴍʏ ʙʟᴀᴋᴇ ♕ (
anarchos
) wrote
2020
-
01
-
20
10:12 pm
Entry tags:
game: cerealia
,
ic: inbox
,
ooc
✪ inbox
text ✪ voicemail ✪ video ✪ audio ✪ action
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-27 08:39 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I guess it's pretty clear that imposter Clarke is radically different from the Clarke you know.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-27 08:46 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I could always check you over, just to be sure.
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-27 08:49 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Wow. What a pickup line.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-27 08:51 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
the important part is whether or not it worked
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-27 08:53 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Nope, sorry; I'm not as easy to charm as regular Clarke.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-27 09:09 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
But now I know regular Clarke is easy to charm so it's a winner either way
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-27 09:11 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
You're ridiculous.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-27 09:12 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
But
charming
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-27 09:13 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Maybe.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-27 11:06 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Definitely. I know even imposter Clarke is probably smiling.
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-27 11:08 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
You think so? Pretty sure of yourself.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-27 11:12 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Only when it comes to you.
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-27 11:14 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
You
do
know me pretty well.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-27 11:21 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Likewise. More than most anyone else.
[Only Octavia tops it, really.]
I really am sorry if housemate felt dismissive. I could never dismiss you.
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-27 11:23 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
It didn't, Bell. I just wanted to give you a hard time.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-27 11:33 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
I know, I just - wanted to be sure.
[He dumb.]
At least it wasn't something long, like cohabiting coleaders.
1/2
flamekeeper
2016-05-28 12:00 am (UTC)
(
link
)
That would have been accurate, too.
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-28 12:01 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I guess we have a few applicable labels, don't we?
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-28 12:46 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Too many. Not in a bad way - we just need to figure out a really good one to top them all.
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-28 12:48 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Best friends not cutting it for you anymore?
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-28 12:52 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I mean, it's not like that's all we are anymore, all things considered.
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-28 12:56 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Oh, that's true.
no subject
anarchos
2016-05-28 01:15 am (UTC)
(
link
)
[He'll just. Stare at the text for a little while first. It's ok everything is fine.]
Not that we stopped being best friends though. Think we're kinda stuck with that one.
1/2
flamekeeper
2016-05-28 01:31 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Yeah, we'll always be that.
no subject
flamekeeper
2016-05-28 01:31 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Sorry, Bell, I should go. It's pretty busy here tonight.
(no subject)
anarchos
-
2016-05-28 01:51 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
flamekeeper
-
2016-05-28 02:24 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
anarchos
-
2016-05-28 02:50 (UTC)
-
Expand
144 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[Only Octavia tops it, really.]
I really am sorry if housemate felt dismissive. I could never dismiss you.
no subject
no subject
[He dumb.]
At least it wasn't something long, like cohabiting coleaders.
1/2
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Not that we stopped being best friends though. Think we're kinda stuck with that one.
1/2
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)